Tuesday, October 31, 2006
S&P expects robust oil, gas merger activity to continue
The ratings company said the declining asset pool, "along with the incentive to maximize returns while markets remain strong, are additional industry drivers," in a report called "Ratings Roundup: For US oil and gas, M&A and softer prices could pressure sector ratings."
Oil and especially natural gas prices have decreased nearly 60% from the start of 2006, and "could pressure credit quality," S&P said.
"High-yield energy and production companies, which typically have high cost structures, limited liquidity, and are often weighted to natural gas, could be at risk if the trend is prolonged," it added.
The energy and production industry "appears solid," although not as active as many participants had planned at the beginning of 2006, said S&P's Paul Harvey. The result could be reduced spending in 2007, if commodity prices continue to show softness, he added.
But Harvey said that given the generally favorable industry outlook, solid forward pricing, and the desire for rapid growth, "robust M&A activity is likely to continue." In addition, acquisitions will remain a key growth engine for the remainder of 2006, and possibly into 2007, he said.
Decimation of large caps by mergers shifts focus to small caps
October 30 - Montreal Gazette - More than 1,200 smaller firms often are under-owned or under-followed by analysts. A combination of mergers and acquisitions plus foreign takeovers during the past year is decimating the market for Canadian large capitalization companies, turning the investor spotlight onto Canadian small caps. Read More.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Strong deal teams/processes = captured synergies
October 18 - Deal-makers, executives, and objective market data agree that many deals fail to deliver expected synergies or value. Reasons vary widely. Sometimes companies enter a deal with unrealistic expectations. Other times complexity runs amok, and management of the deal-making process spirals beyond effective control. Success of defensively or competitively motivated acquisitions can be hard to measure. And, as veteran deal-makers know, a major transaction is a huge distraction. Unprepared, some companies let focus on integration drift in deference to critical day-to-day operations.
A 2006 KPMG/Stanford University M&A forum indicates that strategic players continue to refine their deal-making processes and review the roles and composition of their corporate development departments. Companies such as Hewlett-Packard, Oracle and Sun Microsystems are among those setting new measures to continually improve their transaction processes.
While deal success relies on many factors, research into the leading practices of corporate development groups indicates a strong correlation between a common set of core principles and the statistical probability of achieving transaction success.
Another recent KPMG survey of over 200 Fortune 500 and equivalent companies headquartered in North America and Europe finds those companies with the most successful deal records – those that meet or exceed 75% of their projected transaction synergies – share similar team compositions, deal-making structures and transaction processes. These processes are captured in the following guiding principles.
Balance Roles and Responsibility
Balance is elusive in any corporate endeavor, but nowhere more so than in the inherently disruptive deal management process. Companies that involve corporate development and business-unit personnel evenly during the deal process are 20 percent more likely to achieve deal success than those that involve either group disproportionately. Similarly, companies that retain corporate development involvement throughout the integration are more likely to meet milestones than those in which such personnel are less involved.
Involve Senior Staff
Today’s corporate development departments have a disproportionate balance of junior to senior staff. With deals reliant on timeliness and accuracy, inconsistent results born of inexperience can be costly. Survey data indicates that those companies involving a higher ratio of vice presidents and executives are 20 percent more likely to execute a successful transaction than those comprised largely of analysts and managers.
Leverage Transaction Expertise with Rotations
With M&A now a core process in virtually every industry, successful companies are nurturing a broad base of transaction experience. These companies recruit talent into their corporate development departments, and then rotate them over time into other functions. Management can then tap those employees’ transactions experience if a deal later arises that affects their respective business units. Survey results suggest such rotations help companies achieve greater transaction success.
Oversight Confers Advantage
With complexity rife in any major transaction, corporate development departments are adding structure and oversight to their deal-making processes. Leading companies are making greater use of hurdles and checkpoints to clarify and codify specific phases of a deal. Transaction committees that receive a steady level of corporate oversight are 40 percent more likely to be successful than those who receive too little monitoring or too much hand-holding.
Start Early
Leading corporate development groups recognize that transaction preparation begins very early. Once the strategy committee signs off on the company’s acquisition policies and objectives, the best start crafting internal decision-making documents. The benefit is that corporate development groups then have defined ‘fit characteristics’ with which to select and measure a given target. This focuses time and resources more effectively once a deal does come in the door.
Enlist Corporate Development Support in Estimating Deal Finances
It is important to maximize business unit involvement during the due diligence stage, but the corporate development department should play a central role in preparing financial estimates and forecasts. Companies that use the corporate development department to quantify projected synergies observe higher rates of deal success than those that rely solely on business units or other divisions.
Find the Experts
Where deals are in strategic areas or where the industry or subject matter is technical, leading companies go straight to the experts. Business unit and functional specialists internal to the company can help corporate development departments screen the acquisition target and evaluate the strength of the assets at stake. These experts can form part of the transaction team, and assist with integration planning. External advisors also play a role. Companies that engage consultants, accountants and bankers are more likely to achieve transaction success than those who rely solely on internal resources.
In the end, increased corporate development group involvement is a best practice statistically shown to improve the likelihood of a successful transaction. — Richard Hanley
Richard Hanley is the KPMG Transaction Services Co-Global Lead for the Electronics, Software and Services sector and head of KPMG’s Transaction Services Group in Silicon Valley.
Global Wind Energy Market is Growing Faster Than Other Renewable Energy Markets
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Global Technology M&A Deal Value Already Surpasses 2005 Total by $20 Billion, Innovation Advisors Reports
Monday, October 16, 2006
The transaction strategy needs to look beyond expected synergies
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Private Equity Keeps Booming
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
The right price is key to a good transaction
Studying M&A targets
Monday, October 09, 2006
Which Energy Firms Will Get Taken Out?
Despite near-term uncertainty created by the big drops in oil and natural-gas prices, this year could rival the more than $160 billion spent worldwide last year on energy mergers and acquisitions. Read More.
Florida M&A demand to grow
Private equity firms raise record cash in 2006
A string of mega fund raisings from some of the world's biggest private equity firms -- including Permira, The Blackstone Group and Cinven - has helped push 2006 to record volumes, already 6 percent higher than all of 2005, when a record $283 billion was raised. Read More.
Friday, October 06, 2006
Business Outlook Survey - U.S. CFOs see trouble ahead
Buyouts Keep Getting Bigger As Private Equity Firms Rush To Invest Billions Pouring Into New Funds
In the biggest leveraged buyout ever, three private equity firms agreed in late July to take Nashville, Tennessee-based hospital operator HCA private for $21.3 billion of cash and the assumption of $11.7 billion in debt, or a total value of $33 billion. The investor group was made up of Boston-based Bain Capital; Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, or KKR; and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity; along with Thomas F. Frist, HCA’s founder. The previous record LBO was the $25 billion buyout of RJR Nabisco in 1989. Read More.
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Defense, aerospace sectors look strong
It will be more than two years until the aerospace industry encounters a "cyclical downturn," and while Bank of America said it maintained its "Neutral" sector stance on defense, "we are more positively inclined," due to expectations of a larger fiscal 2007 supplemental spending bill, and 4 percent to 5 percent core budget growth over the next two years.
Instead of an 8 percent decline to $107 billion in 2007 supplemental funding, Bank of America now expects an 8 percent increase to $130 billion, with $70 billion already appropriated and $60 billion likely to be requested in February or March.
"Earnings growth into 2008 could turn out to be more healthy than we are currently forecasting, particularly for Army-related contractors," according to the note. But since defense stocks already have done well this year, "we may see some profit taking as we approach the midterm elections."
That potential profit-taking could create buying opportunities for General Dynamics Corp., Oshkosh Truck Corp. and Alliant Techsystems Inc., according to Bank of America.
In afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange, shares of General Dynamics dipped 43 cents to $74.37, while Oshkosh added 84 cents to $54.24 and Alliant slid 17 cents to $81.90.
U.S. business optimism down on energy prices
October 5 - Reuters - Optimism about the health of the U.S. economy is down among the nation's small to mid-sized businesses as they have been hit with higher energy prices, a survey on Thursday showed.
PNC Financial Services Group's semiannual survey of small and middle-market business owners showed a third of the 501 respondents were not at all optimistic about the economy going forward. That compares to 23 percent surveyed in April. Read More.